Tuesday, 7 June 2016

Big Brother: Week One woes


Well, week one in the Big Brother house certainly went with hitch after hitch. 

Of course I'm not talking about the live content but of course the antics in (both!) of the houses. 

The Others were shaken to the core to see that some of them have more than just the connection of a wall between them.  

If I'm honest, there are so many of them in there, that I still haven't gotten my head around who I certainly like or dislike, but each person in that house is a character. 

Let's start with the Mains. Marco - I don't like him. I didn't from the moment he stepped into the house. I thought he was a show off - which is fine to an extent but he's very cocky and sure of himself and I don't like when people cross the fine line. I doubt the public will take to him either. Fair enough if he's in an open relationship with his fiancĂ©e and he and Laura certainly seem to be making the most of that. But it's the way he looks to the camera whilst with her... He's a creep. 
Whereas I think that Laura is playing the person who she thinks she has to be. She and Marco are trying to be the Steph and Jez of last Celeb BB. 

I like Jackson, he seems sincere, and Alex too. I think they will both pass their tasks now in the Other house and will gain their housemate status once more. Chelsea, however, not too sure about yet. 

The twins were strange ones. Especially Victoria and her reason for leaving. What did she think was going to happen living in a shared house? Of course there were going to meat eaters... 
Her line of opening the fridge to find a corpse inside is the line of the show so far. 

As for the Others.. They're a feisty bunch! 
Ryan I'm not sure about.. He could easily turn into someone you love to hate. But I'm wondering if his issue with Sam could be because he's attracted to him? 
As for Andrew, he could very easily ruin the undercover mission now he's in the main house for a while. He kind of already did! He likes to think of himself as a bit of a Mastermind. But in my experience know-alls are sometimes only No-alls... 
I don't actually dislike any of the other Others, they're just all very good game players. Which I suppose is why they were chosen! 

I like the thought process behind having a second house but since some of the housemates broke out and claimed to see Alex in the glass window of the Other house, and the Others shouted hello to the twins on their escape, maybe BB didn't think things through as much as they thought. I hope it won't ruin whatever else they have in store. 
I also think that once you break free and run through the chicken coops of backstage, you shouldn't be allowed to return to the house. End of. 

On Tuesday night, apparently, another twist will be revealed. What it will be who knows. 

It is a brand new game after all... 

What are your thoughts so far on the new series? 

Thursday, 2 June 2016

Big Brother: Who are these Others?

Big Brother has revealed its biggest secret for the new series, so far, in announcing that the rumoured two houses is a fact, and the second of the homes will be populated by 'The Others'. Sounds like a terrifying movie, doesn't it?

Before I go into that, though, today was the day that BB released new house photos. It's certainly bright and reminded me of an 80's neon club! 



That said, it also has something 'spacey' about it which could coincide with 'The Others' theme. The Unknown... 




We've had secret bedsits or rooms in Big Brother before, but never two houses. Some may say the concept is the same but this series excites me. 
The housemates will apparently have no idea that there's another house, containing 'The Others', or that these Others will be fighting to replace them in the main house. Even if one or two housemates get an incline about another house, they or the Others surely won't realise that some of them are connected in more ways than just the walls of the BB house. I reckon it'll be family members, friends, enemies..? 

"Neither the housemates nor The Others are aware that some of them are already connected to each other," Channel 5 teased. "And these connections could turn both houses upside down. But what are these connections, and how will Big Brother use them to keep everyone on their toes?"

More may be revealed over the weekend - but we'll definitely have a bigger insight at Tuesday's 9pm lunch night... 

Friday, 27 May 2016

I'm back with Big Brother...

When I say back, I mean blogging back - not appearing on the summer series of BB back!

In 11 days - that's Tuesday 7th June - Emma Willis, who's practically JUST given birth to her third baby, Trixie Grace, along with BBBOTS' Rylan Clarke-Neal will be welcoming a new host of Big Brother contestants, aka Our New Best Pals for the summer! 
I'm actually more excited about this series than I have been about any other in recent years, because so far it hasn't been given a 'name', like Timebomb for example. 

Rylan has already said it'll be a "brand new game" and it's been described as 'unpredictable'.  That there is one of my favourite words, as its sub-meanings could be 'exciting', 'shocking' and...'OMG'. Exactly what we crave from BB, right? 

Channel 5 have also teased that from (perfect Marcus voiceover voice!) 'Day One in the Big Brother house' the housemates will be "under attack from an unseen ominous dark force that will have a dramatic and divisive effect on the house. Whilst things may appear to be straightforward, Big Brother will ensure that no-one will have the entire picture. There may even be deeper connections at work. The housemates are not alone and they should be prepared for paranoia and suspicion." Ooo-err! 
There have been rumours of a split house, or two separate houses, after planning permission was received to extend the plot. Other whispers are that celebrities and us mere civilians may share one house... I'm not sure about the celeb rumour because CBB is fab in its own right, and has been promised to follow right after the summer series. 


We also haven't had any house pictures yet, which is always a highlight of any Big Brother build-up, so who knows what other surprises are in store? 

But those teasers at Channel 5 have also revealed that the house has been "transformed into a slick, stark monochrome world. Whilst everything may appear to be black and white, that certainly won't be the case. Viewers should prepare for a 'yin and yang'-style force to evolve Big Brother for a new generation. This force will affect the housemates for better or for worse."

Have those tit-bits got you geared up for the new series, and what do you think is in store this year?


Wednesday, 2 March 2016

HOLLYOAKS: Major hearts for 'Trienna'...


Okay, so Sienna is possibly my fave Hollyoaks character (apart from Brendan Brady, obvs...).
Even in her crazier days, I was championing her.

And now I'm champing her new, possible relationship with Trevor Royle. Oh yes. The pair have been sharing a few close chats, as Si-Si helps Hollyoaks' hardest man come to terms with PTSD, following an attack on him by Sienna's fiance, Ben, his son Dylan's death at the hands of Gloved-Hand Killer, Lindsey, and a stint in prison for being framed for the Gloved-Hand killings himself.

Now, Sienna's friendship with Trev was met by a few 'WOAH'S' on social media, and over the weeks we've seen them strike up a closer bond, with Trevor especially looking like he's falling for arch-nemesis Ben's girl.

I think the pairing is genius from the writers, and the chemistry between Anna Passey and Greg Wood is electric.
It's also genius, especially with the messy situation revolving around Ben believing that Trevor killed his daughter, Carly, when actually it was Sienna's daughter Nico (who's set to turn even more murderous, herself, if the rumours be true...)
I also think it will give us another layer of Trevor, who's always been the 'scary' one in the village.
Sienna has (somehow!) managed to redeem herself after her crazy plots against Nancy Osborne, and pretending to be pregnant. Now she's softer somehow, and her relationship with Ben turned her into a family woman... but after Ben's erratic behaviour of late, it's easy to see how even Trevor, who's showing his softer side with Si-Si, looks appealing.

Anna Passey, who plays Sienna, has tweeted a pic of the two with the quote 'Trouble.'
Trouble, yes... But brilliant trouble at the least! And so many questions...

This week, things take a turn, as Sienna is stabbed, but who does it?
Both Nico and Grace are in the firing line - as Trevor finds Grace over a lifeless Sienna while Nico does a runner. With Trevor looking worried about his new love interest, just how far will their secret relationship go if Sienna pulls through? And how far has it gone already?
Sienna just has to pull through the attack on her, because this is a plot which could run and run. WIth Trevor on her side, will Nico's dramatic behaviour be reigned in and how will the teen cope if she learns of her mum's deceit on her step-dad, Ben, who she seemingly adores. Seemingly, because I also wonder if Nico is a little obsessed with Ben and wants to replace the daughter he lost. The daughter she killed. How will Grace behave if she finds out?
Ben has already attacked Trev once, so he may well do again if he catches the pair in the act.

But then, if Sienna and Trevor do fall head-over-heels, will it be the making of them both?

Forbidden love... Triena forever... But then again, look what happened to Freddie and Lindsey Roscoe!

MORE SOAPS

SOMEWHERE OVER MY RAINBOW

DRAMA NEWS

REALITY TELLY GOSSIP

Tuesday, 2 February 2016

Hollyoaks: Get ready, Freddie!


I was devastated when Freddie Roscoe was killed by his wife, Lindsey (aka The Gloved Hand) but it didn't last long as the good people at Hollyoaks didn't keep his survival secret from us for too long. 
Fred has since been holed up in Police Witness Protection, and will soon be let loose back into the village, when DS Thorpe - who is possibly the worst copper, ever, in soap land! - realises that Trevor couldn't ever have been the serial killer. 
While Freddie has been away, the Roscoe's have said a final farewell to poor Ziggy (still can't get over it, *sob*) and Lindsey has managed to get her claws back into her 'safe place', that is Joe. 
While things begin to look up for Lindsey, in more ways than one, and Kim is happy that her sister (probably!) won't kill again, Freddie phones his wife... 

The conversation will surely go one of two ways...

'Hey honey... I'm home back from the dead!' 

It's this one that would prove to us that Fred doesn't have a dolly-donut that Lindsey is the one who almost bumped him off. 
But seeing as she's now 'pregnant' with Joe's baby, and we know from secret squirrel soap sites, that Freddie will be sleeping on the Nightingales' sofa, it doesn't look like Frindsey will be back together any time soon. Fred had best have eyes in the back of his head, as of course, when Linds goes to meet him, she brings along her trusty killer kit, to syringe him once more! Luckily for Freddie, his brothers walk in just at the right time, so he's safe from Hollyoaks heaven. For now...
Ellie Nightingale had also better watch out, as her feelings for Freddie also grow, and the pair end up getting it together. 
I'd bet that Lindsey will hate Freddie moving on without her, even though she sees Joe as her saviour. She's obviously a 'cake and eat it' kinda gal. 

The second way the conversation could turn is...

'Guess what, you didn't manage to really kill me, you psychotic crazy lady!' 

I doubt it'll be this one. If only for story progression. I can't help but wonder though, if Freddie does know deep down that Lindsey is the killer. 
He loves her, so is he protecting her, even though she was after his blood? And if he's not keeping schtum because of his feelings, has he got an ulterior motive, of revenge?
We know that Fred loves to dice with danger, so either way, it could work. 


We also know that Lindsey will be unmasked to her fellow villagers this year, and if Freddie isn't the one to prove her guilt, maybe it will come from little Charlie, who saw her kill Dr S'avage?

Failing that, there's also dastardly old Silas, who's returned to crack the Gloved Hand case himself. 

And like the old saying goes... It takes one to know one, if you know what I mean... 

MORE SOAPS

SOMEWHERE OVER MY RAINBOW

DRAMA NEWS

REALITY TELLY GOSSIP

Tuesday, 19 January 2016

CBB - Time to be loud about it...

I've not blogged about this series of CBB, even though there has been loads to shout about! But I shall now break my silence, at what I'm hoping is just the right time...

Last week was the first full week in the house, even though it feels like we've been watching the drama-filled abode for about a month already!
I wasn't sure if this bunch of housemates would bring the entertainment of previous series' but I think it's actually been the best bit of BB telly in years. Tiffany's meltdown over the wrong David dying was actual gold. It was that uncomfortable I-know-I-shouldn't-laugh-but-I-have-to moment. It was here, too, that I began to change my views on certain housemates I thought I liked. John, for example. The worm turned here, as he headed up the 'get Tiffany out' brigade. The girl made a genuine mistake, and yes, she was shouting still at Angie afterwards, but I think it was more embarrassment than nastiness. We've all been there. I also don't understand why Kristina felt unsafe being around Tiffany, unless something happened which we weren't allowed to see by the people that be.

When you thought that David-gate couldn't be topped, off kicked Megan! Many girls have promised to show their boyfriends the video of her almighty blowup during future domestics. Megan's rant would make even Katie Hopkins shudder, I'm sure! But she did tell the truth, about John especially. And there was no need for him to correct her, or antagonise the situation, but he did.
John hasn't done himself many favours over the last few days, and nominating Darren Day proved that he wasn't actually that good a mate.
I also had respect for Megan, for when she walked back into the house, she remembered the whole argument, some word-for-word, so alcohol couldn't have had that big an affect.

But then, it was over to Stephanie Davis. Now - I don't agree that Jeremy is all innocent, as he shouldn't have pursued someone who had a boyfriend. But, he has tried to pull away, a number of times, and that's only what we've actually seen in an hours show. Steph crying in the diary room about upsetting Sam (her man) and then ten minutes later popping off to see Jeremy and jumping into his bed proved that she wasn't 'misunderstood' or 'naive' - she is actually a bit of a tartypants. And that's being polite!
Jeremy even said to her that she wants to have her cake and eat it, and I agree. The girl hasn't once accepted that her behaviour is the reason she's doubtful that Sam will still be by her side on the outside world. It's been Big Brother's fault, Jeremy's fault, other housemates' fault for mentioning about it... Everyone but her!
And on Sunday nights show, Stephanie didn't like Jeremy pushing her away, so she got him on the sofa, and told him that she loved him! 'Of course you don't, it's been ten days', Jeremy told her. And that's where he should have left it... Platonically until they leave the house. But Jeremy seems to me, a weak man, who can't refuse Steph's advances.

Stephanie's row with Gemma, who can't help but involve herself in everyone's drama!, really showed her colours. Gemma only said aloud what everyone else was gossping about. I loved Scotty T, who had revealed to the house that Jeremy and Steph HAD snogged, hiding under the duvet. It was his fault the house knew the truth!
Gemma was in the right throughout her argument, and Steph still couldn't admit her actions were the problem. No it wasn't Gemma, or the other housemates' business, but hearing someone cry about their relationship, only to do no favours to themselves five mins later must be annoying. I think I'd of said the same as Gemma in that situation. Twitter went into meltdown, and even Steph's ex-Hollyoaks castmates had no nice words about her... She's exactly what she says on the tin. But I can't wait to watch more!

And we may not have to wait much longer, as the CBB Facebook page has asked this question...


Yes, that is Sam Reece. Stephanie's 'boyfriend.' 

As it came from the official page, I'm thinking that there could be some truth... David Gest (who I'm gutted about leaving!) needs replacing, right? 
But would Sam have been a choice if there was no Steph/Jeremy fling? I hope it's not all been staged, on Steph's part. I think Jeremy is being completely honest about his feelings. 
Sam going in, however, would be AMAZING telly. I'd love him to go in, shake Jeremy's hand and say 'good luck...' and then crack on to make friends with everyone else, leaving Steph ignored and in the corner! 
It might be one of the best reunions of BB history, but will it cause too much trouble? 

In the excitement of the rumour, there's also an eviction tonight... John, Daniella, Tiffany and Kristina. It;ll be between John and Kristina I'd imagine. But to be honest, all I care about is getting Sam in that house!! 

MORE REALITY TELLY GOSSIP

SOMEWHERE OVER MY RAINBOW

SOAPS

DRAMA NEWS



Friday, 8 January 2016

EastEnders: Beautiful tears...


Last night's double bill of my favourite soap blew people away. It was highly emotionally charged and both the writing and acting were award winning.

In the first episode we said goodbye to dear old Charlie Slater, which was a lot more heartwrenching than I expected when I first heard that he was going to Walford's heaven in the sky. I think maybe Kat's heartache, upon finding out that she has a secret son, and the betrayal by her mother and Mo, made it all the more poignant.
Kat had screamed blue murder at Mo, and Charlie, too, before his attack came on. In the shock of what was happening, the Slater secrets were swept under the carpet.

I thought it was so clever, that one of Charlie's last lines was all about Brian's secret family and the the fact that he had 'three girls'. The seed of doubt was planted in Kat's mind that Kyle was lying to Stacey about being her brother. Of course, we know that Kyle is Transgender, and hasn't yet managed to tell Stacey the truth.
This might well be a good thing, as Stacey's Post-Partum Psychosis escalated to frightening lengths during the second episode last night.
Convinced that baby Arthur is the son of God, Stacey thinks that everyone is out to take him away from her. And innocent remarks from those around her spurred this on.
I especially felt for Carmel last night. She's heartbroken for Shabnam and Kush, after discovering that they can't have any more children, and knowing that her one hope of having a grandchild is just across the Square was too much for her to keep quiet about. Bonnie Langford has slotted straight in to Alvert Square and I really like her character. The secret about Kush being Arthur's real dad was also revealed to Shabnam last night, as she overheard an upset Kush breaking down to Carmel, after he and Martin frantically tried to track Stacey and the baby down.
It's a complicated situation, where I feel for everybody involved, even Kush and Stacey, because although they did betray Shabnam and Martin by keeping their one night stand a secret, as far as I remember, that it happened while neither party was in a relationship with their now partners.

It was a sad goodbye to Uncle Charlie...
Talking of secrets, Phil and Alfie's hospital scenes were also a breath of fresh air to watch, as the two men opened up to each other about their health worries. Alfie has been told that his brain tumour will need operating on in the future, but with Charlie's death, and once he finds out abut Kat's secret son, how long will it take Alfie to tell the truth?
I'm looking forward to the Ireland spin-off, where the Moon's head off to find Zoe's lost twin, Luke. The social media rumour mill has said that not only could Sean Slater be the boy, but also Stacey's ex, Luke, played by Matt Willis (remember?!) The only evidence is that the two share the same name, but as Sister Ruth said - adopted baby's names are more than likely changed.
If Kat does find her son, then another character may well be introduced to the Square - and that's never a bad thing. I assumed when the plot was announced that he would be someone already living in Walfiod (I love a Soap coincidence!) but as it's gone on, I think the likelihood of that has shrunk.

The second episode of last night ended with Stacey on the roof of the Queen Vic, but before getting there, she believed she'd found a 'sign' from her dad, and called Kyle to meet her, as she thinks that her dad sent him, as the only one she can trust. It was a heartwarming scene as Kyle, who seems so desperate to be accepted by his sister, went along with Stacey's erratic plans, promising to looks after her and Arthur, even though his face told that he was concerned about Stacey's behaviour. Once the penny finally dropped for Kyle, that Stacey wasn't well, he called Martin, who then subsequently told Stace that Brian had never had a son...
Stacey was now even more petrified, and a worried Kyle watched as Stacey ran with Arthur, into a cab, where she had a vision of Charlie, telling her to go home. For EastEnders, this was a risky scene, but worked, as it took us into Stacey's mind.
As Stacey went upstairs at The Vic, I found it strange that Nancy didn't seem worried that she just went up to their home, and didn't immediately go to find out what Stacey wanted in the flat above The Vic.

Anyhow, Stacey wanted to go on to the rooftop to be closer to God.
The episode's end was filmed beautifully picturesque, as the camera zoomed outwards and upwards, leaving Stacey teetering at the point where her beloved Bradley fell to his death. Lacey Turner was astonishing during these episodes, and her acting shone. She was even praised on Twitter for an 'Oscar Winning Performance'!

Lacey Turner's performance was award winning... Surely!
Next week we will see Martin rush up to rescue her and Arthur, but Stacey then drops the bombshell that Martin isn't Arthur's dad. God is...
Martin will then realise that something is seriously wrong with Stacey's frame of mind, but how will he help her? And now that Shabnam knows the truth about Arthur's paternity, and with Stacey suffering with her Post Partum Psychosis, will she reveal the truth to Martin straight away?
I think the secret will stay hidden for a while longer, at least. One thing I will be surprised about is if Kush and Shabnam's marriage survives. I just don't think that Shabs will be able to stay, knowing the truth. I would like to actually see her moved in with Shirley, Buster and her daughter, Jade. The relationship building between Shabnam and Jade has been a nice, slow-burning one to watch, especially with the circumstances surrounding, and I think that Shirley and Shabnam could actually be a  good partnership with bringing Jade up, as they are so polar opposite.

EastEnders has surpassed its Christmas and New Year surprises, and it's only one week into the New Year. Looking ahead, I'm excited to see what's next... especially with Phil's cirrhosis storyline and him tracking down long-lost Louise... Roxy will also almost certainly have to return at some point, and Ronnie's life will be flipped once more with Jack's permanent return.
I definitely think it's time for a full-on Mitchell comeback over the coming months!

MORE SOAPS

SOMEWHERE OVER MY RAINBOW

DRAMA NEWS

REALITY TELLY GOSSIP